TV

Football needs to find its Tony Romo to drag coverage out of the dark ages

The legendary NFL quarterback is the pre-eminent analyst for any sport. Why is football so far behind?

 
9:00am on Sunday 11th October 2020
By
Paul Macdonald

When Amazon Prime recently launched their foray into Premier League production they gave users the option of turning off commentary altogether and just enjoy the stadium noise. At the same time, IBM is building an AI that can commentate on matches. How in the hell have we reached this point?

This is a coupling of two inherent problems with modern football analysis. One, that commentary is so rudimentary and automatic that anyone, even a machine, can do it. And two, that the analysis currently coming through your speakers is so soul-destroying, so utterly devoid of any kind of contemplation or forethought that you would rather hear nothing instead. If that isn’t a wake-up call for BT Sport in particular, the current nadir of sports broadcasting, then what is?

The problem is now the acceptance of these rock bottom standards, but a glance at other sports finds that with the correct personnel and requisite respect for the art form, great things can happen.

ROMO RULES

Step forward Tony Romo. The Dallas Cowboys legend is one of the greatest quarterbacks in the history of the NFL, but he is also one of the greatest minds. His transition to the commentary box has injected a whole new perspective on the in-game action for casual and hardcore fans alike, and his ability to predict plays and match outcomes has become a running joke, such is his accuracy in doing so. But it’s not a gimmick; when you know your sport so well that you know what’s coming next, and, crucially, can articulate it in a coherent fashion, it brings a whole other dimension to coverage.

And the baffling thing with football is that so many other sports get it so right, too; Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton, former England captains both, are exceptional on Sky’s cricket coverage, while the same channel have one of the finest scene-setters in Ewen Murray, golf’s orator-in-chief, ably supported by Mark Roe, Paul McGinley and countless others.

For F1, see Martin Brundle. Tennis, Mark Petchey, Mats Wilander, John McEnroe. The list goes on. That isn’t to say that these sports don’t have uninformed analysts entering the consciousness, but there seems to be a greater effort to be selective in who we are forced to listen to.

And yet, in football, we have myriad problems that preclude us from reaching Romo status. The first is that there’s a generation of skint ex-footballers with agents parading them around to literally anyone who will have them, from a graveyard Sky Sports News slot to an asinine debate on TalkSport, via every conceivable podcast or betting show in between.

This is less the fault of the player, and more the game; we are at peak volume of bad football analysis and there’s more than enough to go around for Clinton Morrison, Stephen Warnock, and the rest of the gang.

NO MORE MACCA, PLEASE

And secondly, there’s a fundamental untruth that permeates football in particular - that every player who featured at the highest level actually understands the game they made as a career. It’s simply not true, and there’s even fewer that can properly articulate what they experienced in club life.

It’s why the likes of Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher are elevated because they are currently by far the best of an increasing sorry bunch. We need to not only see more of them develop, we need them to challenge each other to take coverage to the next level.

Football's fundamental untruth is that every player who has featured at the highest level actually knows anything about the game they made as a career.Paul Macdonald

Because - and it’s becoming increasingly obvious - broadcasters feel that the ‘man on the street’ is not interested in a deep dive into how matches are won, that they are keen on banter, on quotes, on controversy. And it drags the overall standard down to Steve McManaman levels of banality that viewers are quite literally listening to background noise as an alternative, as if stadium sounds have been transmitted through their Calm app in response to how teeth-grindingly awful 'Macca' is.

And despite a burgeoning online community of statisticians and data provides attempting to offer wider insight into why things in football happen like they do, there seems to be a clear disconnect between what TV producers think people want and what they are given instead.

It will take a Romo to emerge at this point for viewers to take TV commentary and analysis on football seriously again.

Where are they?

Latest news

Standings

La Liga Table: Real Sociedad end weekend on top as Barca win

Real Sociedad end the weekend on top of the table as Barcelona eased the pressure on coach Ronald Koeman by beating Valencia.

  • 3 hours
Premier League

Premier League Table: Arsenal rely on Lacazette for late equaliser

Arsenal were lucky to escape defeat against Crystal Palace as Alexandre Lacazette scored late on to make it 2-2

  • 3 hours
Predicted XI

No Hazard or Bale? How Real Madrid could line up against Shakhtar Donetsk

Carlo Ancelotti will have to turn his Real Madrid side's Champions League campaign around with a tricky away trip to Ukraine

  • 8 hours
Predicted XI

Alisson and Fabinho to return? How Liverpool could line up against Atletico

Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp is hoping to call upon an almost fully fit squad for the club's Champions League trip to Madrid

  • 9 hours
Predicted XI

Grealish to return - How Man City could line up against Club Brugge

Manchester City will be hoping to bounce back in Europe from the loss against Paris Saint-Germain with a win in the Champions League

  • 9 hours
Predicted XI

Unchanged to keep unbeaten run? How Arsenal could line up against Crystal Palace

Mikel Arteta could name an unchanged Arsenal team in the hope they continue their current form against Crystal Palace.

  • 17 hours

Most read